1 00:00:04,309 --> 00:00:02,030 so a couple of days ago I made this 2 00:00:09,440 --> 00:00:04,319 debunking video explaining what was 3 00:00:11,120 --> 00:00:09,450 going on in this this UFO case which it 4 00:00:15,589 --> 00:00:11,130 turned out to be a drop of water on the 5 00:00:18,080 --> 00:00:15,599 camera lens and I made this video so I 6 00:00:19,900 --> 00:00:18,090 could show this experiment that I 7 00:00:22,130 --> 00:00:19,910 performed in my garage where I 8 00:00:24,529 --> 00:00:22,140 duplicated the effect by putting a drop 9 00:00:27,650 --> 00:00:24,539 of water on my camera lens and then 10 00:00:29,300 --> 00:00:27,660 videoing a light in the distance but not 11 00:00:31,999 --> 00:00:29,310 everybody was convinced by this 12 00:00:33,709 --> 00:00:32,009 explanation which I guess shouldn't have 13 00:00:34,790 --> 00:00:33,719 surprised maybe it kind of did surprise 14 00:00:36,799 --> 00:00:34,800 me because it seemed like very very 15 00:00:39,530 --> 00:00:36,809 obvious that this drop of water on the 16 00:00:40,760 --> 00:00:39,540 lens was what was making the effect a 17 00:00:43,729 --> 00:00:40,770 lot of other people said it was very 18 00:00:47,779 --> 00:00:43,739 obvious too so you know I thought what 19 00:00:52,040 --> 00:00:47,789 do I need to do to convince people what 20 00:00:54,979 --> 00:00:52,050 type of explanation is required so I set 21 00:00:59,479 --> 00:00:54,989 up this other version of the experiment 22 00:01:03,889 --> 00:00:59,489 where I have the iPhone lying on face 23 00:01:05,359 --> 00:01:03,899 down and it has a light suspended above 24 00:01:08,710 --> 00:01:05,369 it a single light I turn off the other 25 00:01:11,719 --> 00:01:08,720 lights in the room and I videoed it 26 00:01:13,190 --> 00:01:11,729 close up with one camera and then wider 27 00:01:16,030 --> 00:01:13,200 angle with another camera I also 28 00:01:19,070 --> 00:01:16,040 recorded the video from the iPhone 29 00:01:20,840 --> 00:01:19,080 itself and I put drops of water on this 30 00:01:26,749 --> 00:01:20,850 slide and I move the drops of water 31 00:01:28,420 --> 00:01:26,759 around and try to recreate the situation 32 00:01:33,230 --> 00:01:28,430 that we saw before 33 00:01:34,940 --> 00:01:33,240 so you can see here there is you know 34 00:01:36,499 --> 00:01:34,950 the light that you can see in the sky 35 00:01:40,370 --> 00:01:36,509 and it's very very similar to the light 36 00:01:42,140 --> 00:01:40,380 we see in the UFO video it's kind of 37 00:01:44,090 --> 00:01:42,150 curved on one side and it's got a kind 38 00:01:45,859 --> 00:01:44,100 of like legs on the other side jellyfish 39 00:01:48,740 --> 00:01:45,869 and here I'm moving the camera from side 40 00:01:49,819 --> 00:01:48,750 to side so you can see what happens to 41 00:01:51,620 --> 00:01:49,829 it and you can see here in this 42 00:01:53,899 --> 00:01:51,630 particular instance it is actually kind 43 00:01:55,969 --> 00:01:53,909 of distort a little bit but you can also 44 00:01:59,389 --> 00:01:55,979 see that if you look at the the original 45 00:02:03,109 --> 00:01:59,399 UFO video here I've moved it so it's a 46 00:02:04,520 --> 00:02:03,119 little less a little less rounded like 47 00:02:06,410 --> 00:02:04,530 just the position of the drop is 48 00:02:08,210 --> 00:02:06,420 different and you can see it doesn't 49 00:02:09,619 --> 00:02:08,220 move quite as much it does it does 50 00:02:12,800 --> 00:02:09,629 certainly distort as you move it but 51 00:02:15,710 --> 00:02:12,810 again if you look at the UFO 52 00:02:18,470 --> 00:02:15,720 you see the same effect - I'm trying to 53 00:02:20,150 --> 00:02:18,480 adjust it here is to get a more you know 54 00:02:25,370 --> 00:02:20,160 a line like appearance and here you can 55 00:02:27,320 --> 00:02:25,380 see yeah it's a very thinner line and 56 00:02:28,550 --> 00:02:27,330 you can see there's less movement 57 00:02:30,199 --> 00:02:28,560 especially when it goes from like the 58 00:02:31,760 --> 00:02:30,209 middle to the left hand side when you 59 00:02:34,070 --> 00:02:31,770 move all the way across it it changes 60 00:02:37,120 --> 00:02:34,080 but moving from the middle here to the 61 00:02:41,360 --> 00:02:37,130 left hand side it's it doesn't actually 62 00:02:43,610 --> 00:02:41,370 distort very much especially at the 63 00:02:45,680 --> 00:02:43,620 resolution of the video which wasn't 64 00:02:47,120 --> 00:02:45,690 particularly good here I'm moving the in 65 00:02:49,340 --> 00:02:47,130 the other direction you could see it 66 00:02:53,180 --> 00:02:49,350 actually sorted a lot but the movement 67 00:02:59,479 --> 00:02:53,190 is side to side with phone in portrait 68 00:03:01,340 --> 00:02:59,489 mode so I kind of feel that this should 69 00:03:04,160 --> 00:03:01,350 prove it completely but I don't know 70 00:03:06,470 --> 00:03:04,170 will it will people still try to say oh 71 00:03:08,600 --> 00:03:06,480 this is slightly different to the the 72 00:03:10,670 --> 00:03:08,610 UFO video the UFO video must be 73 00:03:13,340 --> 00:03:10,680 something else you haven't proved it I 74 00:03:15,759 --> 00:03:13,350 don't know it's an interesting thing and 75 00:03:19,190 --> 00:03:15,769 I think this this applies to other 76 00:03:21,050 --> 00:03:19,200 situations you quite often do things 77 00:03:23,270 --> 00:03:21,060 like explain where the iron microspheres 78 00:03:25,190 --> 00:03:23,280 came from on 911 and people say oh you 79 00:03:28,009 --> 00:03:25,200 haven't proved it so I think the 80 00:03:31,699 --> 00:03:28,019 exercise of - what lens do you need to 81 00:03:33,590 --> 00:03:31,709 go to to actually prove something is is 82 00:03:35,780 --> 00:03:33,600 an interesting and valid one so let's 83 00:03:38,780 --> 00:03:35,790 see what happens with this explanation